Getting over disagreements
Whenever there is a disagreement between a person and a decision being made, I think of two things: either that person is right, and everyone else is a fool or the person is wrong, and they are blocking the business from moving forward.
In both cases, there is a similar risk and reward imbalance. There is a high risk for the business if everyone is wrong (and little reward for the individual), and there is risk in blocking the business from moving forward and no reward for the individual if they are wrong.
Effectively, decision disagreements are deadlocks. How can you move forward, then, if you find yourself in the disagreeing seat?
Assuming the decision-making process was sound (e.g., involved the right people, the process itself was documented, etc.), the key is to become conscious that you are part of a bigger machine and that it's mainly your ego running the internal monologue. In the words of Andy Grove,
"an organization does not live by its members agreeing with one another at all times about everything. It lives instead by people committing to support the decisions and the moves of the business."
Andy Grove
If you notice that you have strong feelings about a decision you disagree with, you should get over your feelings if the majority agrees with whatever decision is being made, for a simple reason: worst case scenario is you were wrong, your ego is slightly bruised, and you get to learn from being wrong.
Best case scenario, you get to say, "I told you so."
You win whatever the outcome is.
Filed Under
Subscribe to the systems briefings
Practical diagnostics for products, teams, and institutions navigating AI-driven change.
Subscribe to the systems briefings. Practical diagnostics for products, teams, and institutions navigating AI-driven change. — Subscribe at https://zakelfassi.com/newsletter
About the Author

Engineer-philosopher · Systems gardener · Digital consciousness architect
What's next
A few handpicked reads to continue the thread.
- →2 min read
Fixing Sidekick for Apple Mail on OSX El Capitain and later
programming - →1 min read
Wordle and the genius of inaction.
Analyzing the success of Wordle, this post discusses how its simplicity and design, which limits user actions, creates a unique and engaging experience. Comparing it to Flappy Bird, it highlights the power of inaction in game design, inspired by Jinny Uppal's book In/Action: Rethinking the Path to Results, suggesting a new perspective on achieving results through minimalism.
social-media - →15 min readPart 4
The Service Monarchy: Why Morocco's 2011 Playbook Won't Work in 2025
Morocco survived the Arab Spring by serving its people rapidly. The 2025 GenZ protests reveal governance on autopilot—no DRI for preventing the country from burning. The monarchy must evolve from hard power to service-first governance or face the swarm.
morocco