Entry Zero: The Return to the Source
After years of feeding the digital noise, I met two men without phones: one who built Silicon Valley, one who lives in Morocco. Their shared gravity revealed what I had been ignoring: the signal lives in presence, not timelines.

I have spent years believing that my public presence was fuel. A way to seed new ideas; to launch new products; to keep a signal alive in the noise. But the truth is simpler and heavier:
The signal doesn't live on the timeline. It lives in the people who show up when you least expect them.
Yesterday, at a small dinner, I met Mr. M. A man who built one of Silicon Valley's first microchip companies. A man who shaped the substrate of the digital world. A man who quietly holds the history of our entire era in his palms.
And he does not have a phone.
Not because he is disconnected, but because he is present. Because he never confused reach with relationship. Because he helped design the medium, yet refused its addiction layer. Because he knows that discovery happens in real time, not feed time.
And something about that hit a place in me I had been ignoring.
Two Men, Two Worlds, Same Gravity
My father, back in Morocco, also has no phone. Not out of principle; not out of critique; but out of instinct. He joins the world when he wants; not when it calls him.
Two men. Two worlds. Same gravity.
And in their absence from the digital noise, I saw my own fatigue with perfect clarity.
Years of posting into the wind. Years of trying to "stay visible" just in case I might need it. Years of watching the Web –cosmic, sacred, informational– become diluted by micro-drips of performative presence.
I kept showing up to the concert. But the people I was meant to meet were at the bookstore café.
The Threshold
So this is Entry Zero. The threshold. The real beginning.
I'm returning to the source: the kitchen, the garden, the library, the quiet workshop of the mind. The places where gravity still works. The places where chance encounters can still happen. The places where information has weight, and where human presence is not a metric.
I am archiving my social media accounts. Not as an exit. As a reset.
The blog will remain. A small neighborhood market on a quiet street. If something I write is meant to reach you, it will. No push needed; only pull.
When Reach Became the Goal
Looking back, I can trace the moment when the inversion happened.
I used to write to think. The blog was a workshop where ideas got refined through articulation. Publication was secondary to the process of sharpening thought through prose.
Then came the platforms. The metrics. The engagement analytics.
Slowly, invisibly, writing became performance. Thinking became content. Presence became reach.
The addiction was subtle because it was recursive: you post to stay visible, visibility creates opportunities, opportunities validate the posting, validation reinforces the behavior.
But what if the opportunities you're optimizing for aren't the ones that matter?
Mr. M. didn't need Twitter to build relationships with people who shaped computing history. My father doesn't need Instagram to maintain deep bonds with family and community. Both operate in a different economics—one where attention is abundant precisely because it's not fragmented across feeds.
The Real Cost
Performative presence has a cost beyond time:
It trains you to think in tweet-length thoughts. It conditions you to optimize for virality over depth. It makes you edit your ideas before they're fully formed, sanding down edges that might not "land."
Worse, it makes you mistake visibility for impact.
The metrics lie. A post with 10,000 impressions that generates zero meaningful conversations has less impact than a single dinner table exchange that shifts how someone sees their work.
I've written about this before—how we compress ourselves into legible roles to survive algorithmic feeds. But knowing the dynamic and breaking free from it are different undertakings.
What Remains
The blog stays. The newsletter continues. The work persists.
This isn't a retreat from public thinking—it's a return to the conditions that make thinking possible.
Instead of broadcasting to an imagined audience across platforms, I'll write for whoever finds their way here. Instead of optimizing for engagement, I'll optimize for clarity and depth. Instead of feeding the timeline, I'll tend the garden.
If you're reading this, you already made the choice to seek signal over noise. You navigated here through intention, not algorithmic suggestion. That changes the nature of our exchange.
The Invitation
This is Entry Zero because it's the beginning of a different kind of presence.
Not invisible—present. Not disconnected—selective. Not silent—deliberate.
I'm done confusing reach with resonance. Done mistaking visibility for vitality. Done showing up where gravity no longer works. Broken, even.
The work continues. Just closer to the source.
If something I write is meant to reach you, it will. No push needed; only pull. The way it worked before feeds taught us to forget.
The blog remains. The timeline doesn't. If you want to follow along, subscribe to the newsletter or check back when you feel like it. RSS is also an option. Otherwise, I'll see you in person, where the real signal lives.
Subscribe to the systems briefings
Practical diagnostics for products, teams, and institutions navigating AI-driven change.
Subscribe to the systems briefings. Practical diagnostics for products, teams, and institutions navigating AI-driven change. — Subscribe at https://zakelfassi.com/newsletter
About the Author
Engineer-philosopher · Systems gardener · Digital consciousness architect
What's next
A few handpicked reads to continue the thread.
- →5 min read
When Submission Loses Its Spiritual Meaning
Every system rests on a covenant: I serve, because this service participates in something higher. When that belief collapses, obedience becomes performance. From 18th-century rice fields to modern Slack threads, the pattern repeats—and the consequences are always the same.
philosophy - →8 min read
Source Code: A Standing Note on AI Use in 2025
I got called AI slop by Hacker News for using technological leverage. Twenty years ago, a teacher accused me of plagiarizing Wikipedia for typing an essay. Same pattern, different tools. Time to state my position on AI use publicly.
ai - →10 min read
Writing Reality: When Blog Posts Become Hypersigils
Grant Morrison called it a hypersigil—a story so charged with intention that fiction bleeds into reality. After years of public writing, I'm starting to think every blog post works this way. Not as proof of causation, but as evidence of something stranger: the text always knows more than the writer.
consciousness